IPSEC client does not currently support that on windows 7. The first issue is significant if you need your users to automatically run a login script that maps network drives or apply a computer account policy download and those sorts of things that will not work with cached login. This may be a mistake and I would like to point out two major reasons to go with anyconnect.įirst, It has support for Windows 7 Start Before Login (SBL) and second its better at working with broadband cellular cards.
#CISCO IPSEC VPN CLIENT 64 BIT 64 BIT#
With both products available and ready for use, on 32 and 64 bit versions of windows 7, IT departments are going to face a decision between the two, and many will go with IPSEC because they are used to it and its a little cheaper then anyconnect (essential license).
#CISCO IPSEC VPN CLIENT 64 BIT LICENSE#
More on anyconnect and the different features per license can be found at: The other licensing level (premium) cost is still significant but is only required for functions like the secure desktop and those sort of things. With the anyconnect essential license, which provides anything needed for remote access vpn, it is almost free to add anyconnect license to an ASA. Up to about a year ago, that price was significant but then a new licensing model was announced and it became a non-issue. Anyconnect required additional license and that means higher price.
0 kommentar(er)
